Our tope range round for the .270 is the 130gr Winchester SST Superperformance. vs. 270 WSM. by Norman Turner - Last updated December 15, 2020. In the end, the best cartridge all depends on the type of situation they will be used. Neither cartridge is a 1000 yard big game getter, in my opinion. For areas where it might be necessary to take a longer range shot, the 270Win might be the better choice of a hunting rifle for you. On the other hand, the 308 can have a shorter barrel, making it handier in unforeseen situations while handling a rifle. At the 500 yard mark, we see the same pattern but it is much more distinct. The .308 is the most popular choice. For general long-range shooting, a lot of the above discussion is pertinent here as well. Two of the most well-known cartridges go head-to-head in this detailed article. To be more confident that this trend is the norm, let’s take a look at the average BC for these two cartridges with larger sample groups. The short-range trajectory is always important to look at. A .260 Rem or .243 Win are better choices for that distance. .270 Win vs. .308 Win 12-06-2016, 07:16 PM. Still, the 308 rounds brought a little more momentum, especially at the more common hunting ranges out to 400 yards. This round excels in the velocity category with over 2,200ft.sec at 500 yards and will remain supersonic for several hundred yards beyond that mark. The .243 Winchester was developed by wildcatters who immediately grasped the accuracy potential of the .308 parent case and then necked down the case to accept .243 caliber (6mm) bullets. I've laid many a deer low with the 270. For shots taken at extended ranges, a higher BC often means fewer adjustments will have to be made to get the bullet on target. Let’s take a look at the ten rounds we have selected for this article and see if the trend continues (Graph 2). .243 Win Vs .308 Win: Comparison & Best Ammo; Deals of the Day: Hand-Picked Ammo & Firearm Discounts. And from a hunting perspective, we have already seen that both remain supersonic through the distances that are applicable to hunting shots. The bullet energy is the highest of the selected .308 rounds with 1,300ft.lbs of energy at the 500-yard mark which is enough for even larger game at that range. Our objective is not to name one cartridge as being better than the other. If I was just game hunting though I would get the 270 for the extra zing between 300 and 400 yards. Just from looking at the casing and overall cartridge specs we can begin to garner some information about the .270 vs .308. From the averages above, we see that the .270 Win rounds stay at supersonic speeds for about 80 yards further than the .308 Win rounds. If we look at our comparison of the ten different rounds we have used we can see some general trends (Graph 3). At this point the difference between the two cartridges is right at 10 inches. The higher the SD of a bullet, the deeper penetration it will show. Reviews & Buying Guide. Must see data comparison! AW: Rückstoss 270 Win vs 308 Win. .270 vs. .308 vs. .30-06? Their omission here does not reflect our attitude towards those rounds. The cartridge performs well on longer shots. Coming from a gun-impoverished family, I've never shot these rounds. The 270 Winchester is the winner in most categories, but not by a wide margin. THE BEST GUN DEALS AND HANDPICKED GEAR RECOMMENDATIONS, Subscribe to our Newsletter and we send you the best deals right into your inbox. Create more recoil by 15% than the 6.5 version. .270 Win vs. .308 Win 12-06-2016, 07:16 PM. As far as bullet weights go with the .270, most ammunition is going to fall between 120-160. Within that range, there will be little if any difference in the accuracy of the two based on bullet drop from the .270 v. .308. Ballistics, velocity, trajectory, and energy data analysis. If you look at the individual rounds (not shown) you would see a lot of overlap between these cartridges around the 20ft.lb area. I like the.270 for its … 308 vs 270: Ammunition Selection. What other differences are there? The standard .270 load is a 130-grain bullet, whereas the standard .30-06 is 150 grains. However, the 130gr 270Win load has far less wind drift than the 308 load. This tells us that these rounds are going to have enough velocity for efficient terminal ballistic characteristics. Unfortunately, we are limited in our available space and decided to cut the samples off at ten. You will definitely need to take it round by round regardless of the cartridge and pay a lot of attention to how the bullet is going to react on impact. Dafür hielt er die Patrone mit ihrer gestreckten Flugbahn für ideal. If you want a little bigger caliber go with the time trusted 30-06.There's nothing wrong with the 308 but I like the 270 and 30-06 better. Recoil-wise, the 308 has the edge. Besonders Gebirgsjäger und Steppenjäger schätzen die Qualitäten dieses Kalibers, das optimal auf Gams, Wildschaf und … Especially when it is coming from a hunting perspective where a lot of shots are taken at 300 yards or less. Get lever-action rifle cartridges in this 30-30 Win vs 45-70 Government article here. You might have a little better selection of .270 rounds when searching around a retail store than the .308, but generally, you are not going to have an issue finding these rounds and finding various types of ammunition for each. While we agree that energy is important, we also think shot placement is as important if not more. Impressive ammunition. Let’s take a look at the recoil numbers with more rounds added to the group and see if the same results present themselves. You can see that the flattest shooting rounds belong to the .270 while the rounds showing the steepest drop are .308 cartridges. Best Concealed Carry Insurance [Comparison Chart]. Please share it with your friends on Facebook and Twitter. My dad currently has … 270 with 150's, or 308 with 185's, It basically comes down to the weight of the rifle, all up with scope ,etc, a 7-8 lb rifle without a brake isn't pleasant to shoot while practicing, certainly fine for 1-2 shots at game with a coat on. There is a lot of overlap between the two cartridges with both of them having rounds that carry a significantly more amount of energy while others fall behind. the .270 WSM certainly has the power to be a good 1000 yard shooter. A side-by-side comparison of the .270 Winchester vs. .27 Nosler vs. .277 Sig Fury Joined: Dec 24, 2002 Messages: 4,233 Location: Central IN. What should be taken away here is that both of these cartridges have rounds that are going to range in sectional density. Born and raised in Austin TX, Alfred has been shooting guns since he was 18. It’s a good example of how bullet design is the driving factor in this category. We will also take a look at other categories such as recoil, accuracy, and availability of the ammunition. Several of the .270 rounds have quite a bit higher velocity, especially the 130gr rounds, and that makes sense given the casing capacity. The first is how varied the sectional densities of the .270 rounds appear. While less than an inch difference at 200 yards, nearly four inches at 300 yards, and a little more than five inches at 400 yards, might not seem like much, it can easily be the difference between success and failure. This round is a bit more expensive compared to the other .270 factory loads that we have looked at, but it gives you the best long-range performance. For those who are more interested in long-range shooting, this section might not carry the weight the ballistics section has. I really get tired hearing of the arm chair ballistic jibble spewed forth on so many threads. The data that we have from the large sample is almost exactly the same as the averages from the smaller sample size. If I was just game hunting though I would get the 270 … Peugeot 308 GTi THP 270 vs. Seat Leon Cupra 280 Kompakte Kämpfer im Vergleich Inhalt von Der 308 GTi trägt Chrom und massiert sogar den Rücken, der … Joined Jul 7, 2010 Messages 158. Next Last. Share. Although both cartridges are capable of outstanding accuracy, the 270 Winchester does shoot quite a bit flatter in longer ranges, as mentioned earlier. However the .308 just ain't as sexy as the 270. While the difference between the averages is not as great, we are still seeing close to 200fps or a little less than that from the muzzle out to the 500 yard mark. Just from looking at the casing and overall cartridge specs we can begin to garner some information about the.270 vs.308. Required fields are marked *. That said, the .270 doesn't have a lot of bullet choice at this point. This means that the momentum of a rifle's reaction will exactly equal the momentum of the bullet and powder gasses ejected from the barrel. As you can see in the photo below, the .270 Winchester and .308 Winchester cartridges have very different external dimensions. Eine gute 7x64 Patrone kann das gleiche und Waffen gibts in allen Preisklassen gebraucht auf dem Markt. The advantage in the velocity of the Win270 is more pronounced when compared to the 308 because its smaller diameter shoots lighter bullet weights. The BC is simply a rating that is derived from an equation that uses multiple cartridge/bullet variables. However, the 308Win is the better choice in hunting larger game animals like the red stag, elk, or moose since it uses larger diameter and heavier bullets that are well suited for very large or tough animals especially with 180-grain ammo. And that is not to say that it cannot still be found in military or police force circles today, it certainly is, but not as ubiquitous as it once was. What you should take away from this section is what the BC means, as stripped down as we made it, and the understanding that between these two cartridges, the BC can vary pretty wildly with high and low performing rounds for each. With two decades of chasing all manner of upland game, hooved mammals, strutting gobblers, and any small game that can fit in his Dutch oven, he hopes to offer new ideas and viewpoints on hunting and firearm concepts and traditions. If you know the hunting you want to take part in, this article will make your decision easier. Reviews & Buying Guide, What’s The Best Budget Red Dot Sight? Discussion Starter • #1 • Jan 12, 2006. It’s a new world out there. When we look at these numbers, we are addressing how well a bullet is able to stay in motion when faced with resistance. Whether that is an obstacle in the flight path or the hide and bone of a game animal, momentum gives you an idea of how well the bullet can overcome these obstacles. From this cartridge, the 7.62×51 NATO round was also designed and saw brief use in the US military in Vietnam with the M14 Garand. Jul 7, 2010 #1 New member, first post, so be gentle! As we come to a close with this comparison, we want to bring all the information we have examined and use it to start trying to figure out if there are scenarios where one cartridge might be better suited than the other, or maybe applications where you can’t really go wrong with either of them. The Federal Vital-Shok Nosler Partition 150gr is one of our favorite hunting rounds for the .270 cartridge. Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by ShaiVong, Apr 16, 2003. Die Kaliber wiesen bei Schüssen auf Haupt, Träger, Blatt und Kammer ähnliche Ergebnisse bezüglich der Fluchtdistanz auf. The science of projectiles and firearms, or in other words, the info you need to make the kill!If you are looking for the 270 vs 308 vs 30 06 ballistics chart, the 5.56 trajectory chart, the 300 Win Mag Ballistics data, or the 30 06 trajectory chart; you are in the right place!Here are a few suggestions for using the below dashboard: 1. This scenario is also omitting bullet design, which in real world scenarios, is just as important as any of the data we are looking at. .308 vs .30-06 Comparison. This is another excellent option for medium to larger game. Though the .308 on average has a higher SD here, there are .270 rounds, as we have highlighted, that have similar or better SD numbers. Though the differences are slight overall, we can pick out certain rounds where there is a 4 or 5ft.lb increase in recoil energy from a .270 to .308 round. The same can go for the .270. Thread Status: Not open for further replies. Since we noticed a lesser recoil and flatter projectile in the 270 Winchester cartridge, we considered it as the definite winner in this category. So, the first difference is the .270 uses a smaller bullet, namely a .277-in diameter bullet vs the .308-in diameter bullet of the ’06. At these ranges, the difference between these two cartridges really becomes apparent. Other factors such as velocity and bullet design also play a role in penetration, but we will mostly keep the conversation on sectional density. Cons: Lengthy action and heavier gun. Like the .308, there is a lot of options regarding bullet weight and design, and they are readily available and affordable. There are a plethora of options when it comes to the .308. Saß die Kugel auf dem Blatt, flüchteten die Sauen … Where I personally live we are in a slug only zone and I have a savage 220f to take care of that. From looking at that information, we saw that while the .270 had a slightly higher average BC than the .308, the .308 had rounds with similar and even higher BCs than the .270. If we simply look at the average recoil energy generated by these two cartridges and given by the ballistic calculator software, we see that the .270 and .308 are very similar (Graph 1). Cost between the two doesn't play in my decision making. You can find a case of .308 for twenty bucks and a box down the aisle might be forty dollars. 270 Vs 308. At the 200-yard mark, we do see the rounds from each cartridge begin to group with the .270 rounds showing a slightly flatter trajectory than the .308 rounds. For our top .308 Win range round we like the 168gr Hornady BTHP Match. Bo… Thread starter RemingtonShooter; Start date Jul 7, 2010; 1; 2; Next. An Overview Of 6.5 Creedmoor Vs. 270 270 Winchester. If we step back and look at the two cartridges, we see some pretty interesting results. My 33 year old (used then) .308, after load development, will keep the first three well under .75 inches at 100yds. Both BDL's. While we think it has a large role in making difficult shots easier, don’t make the error of thinking that if a bullet has a high BC, that it is going to do all the work for you or replace experience and skill. Nosler provided the load data used to compare recoil for the cartridges (here and here). This round has nearly 2,000ft.s velocity at 500 yards which is more than enough to get the correct terminal ballistics. The .308 shows certain performance capabilities, which we will get into in this article, that has given it a place in many sharpshooting capacities, including use with the police and some military forces. A .308 is tried and true, and will haul the mail. The .270 can be thought of as a necked down version of the .30-06. When you’re dealing with the decision of which cartridge you want to use, it can be difficult to quickly find all of the information you need to make an informed decision. Velocity is also important to hunters because it also influences terminal ballistics and how well the bullet will expand and transfer kinetic energy to the target. this 30-30 Win vs 45-70 Government article here, this 38 Super and 9mm Luger comparison here, Top Progressive Reloading Presses in 2020, read this Mag577 and Mag292 comparison here, How to Zero A Thermal Scope – 5 Simple Steps, What’s The Best Holographic Sight? Both cartridges have a tremendous amount of energy at the shorter distances, over 2,500ft.lb average muzzle energy for both. .270 Vs. .308. The 308 has many uses as does the 270 Win. Regardless, from a comparison perspective, computer-generated data is perfect for looking objectively at two cartridges and it removes environmental influences. Both cartridges tend to bleed energy at the same rate as they move down range as the differences between the averages remain within 50ft.lbs of energy throughout the 500 yards. For now, let’s jump into these ballistic categories. I've only practiced with two rifle calibers, .22 short/LR and … These numbers are not going to tell you how deep a bullet will penetrate. When we come to these situations we will make clear what is going on and the variables that we used. If you begin picking out individual rounds, you can find some huge differences between .270 and .308 rounds where the .308 round shows between fifteen and twenty more inches of bullet drop. Both cartridges were introduced in the 1950s. With so much overlap, we don’t think there is any significant difference between these two cartridges when it comes to recoil. For small game hunting, the 270Win is a much better option due to lighter grain bullets’ availability. Cartridge and bullet design give it a lot of versatility, and it is also readily available. Bullet’s with the same momentum and same mass but different sectional densities will have different penetration results. This round has a great BC for .308 rounds (.45), and when paired with the velocity and long-range trajectory, you have an excellent round for precision shooting. In Österreich benutzen viele Bergjäger die .270 Win. I feel the .308 has noticeably more recoil than a .243 or a 25-06 and far prefer the 25-06 for most shooting. It is important to note that what we are comparing here is straight recoil energy. The ballistic coefficient (BC) is a term that elicits a lot of attention from hunters and marksmen, or it’s a term that they don’t know a whole lot about. To compare these ten rounds, we have gathered data from the manufacturer as well as generated a good deal from trusted ballistic calculators. If you can, it will drop game, but for all but the best marksman, you are more than likely only going to wound the animal and never find it. Where calculations are made, we will be sure to make clear our variables.
Sam's Club Sectional, Ik Multimedia Irig Pro I/o Audio Midi Interface, Seafood Medley Recipes, Allen Parish Jury Duty, Ni No Kuni 2 Deathbreath Garlic, La Roche-posay Retinol B3 Serum Canada, Android Tv Apk Mirror, Uptodate Citation Generator,